<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.citizensincharge.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>State Feed: Missouri</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/Missouri/rss</link>
 <description>State RSS Feeds</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: After significant changes, Missouri Senate endorses ‘right to farm’ amendment</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-after-significant-changes-missouri-senate-endorses-right-to-farm-amendment</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In a 32-1 vote late Wednesday, the Missouri Senate endorsed a proposed  constitutional amendment that would guarantee that Missouri’s farmers  have the right to farm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The Senate changed the original language in the legislation — House  Joint Resolution 7 and 11 — that would have barred voters from passing  initiatives that would infringe on farmers’ rights.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; That portion of the legislation was removed after opposition from  senators concerned about blocking the initiative petition process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x2055664424/After-significant-changes-Missouri-Senate-endorses-right-to-farm-amendment&quot;&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/bill">bill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/the-joplin-globe">The Joplin Globe</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:53:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4500 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Initiative petition changes move forward</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-initiative-petition-changes-move-forward</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers this year have been supporting proposed changes to the way  initiative petitions are proposed and circulated in the state.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;“I found, when I got involved with this,” said Sen. Jay Wasson,  R-Nixa and chairman of the Financial &amp;amp; Governmental Organizations  and Elections Committee that helped write the bill, “there are people  who would like to make (the petition process) a lot easier.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;“There are people who would like to make it a lot harder.”&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Missouri’s Constitution allows people “to propose and enact or reject  laws and amendments to the constitution by the initiative.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newstribune.com/news/2013/apr/05/initiative-petition-changes-move-forward/&quot;&gt; The News Tribune.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/bills">bills</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/initiatives">initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/the-news-tribune">The News Tribune</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:22:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4492 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Mo. Senate backs higher initiative fraud penalties</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-mo-senate-backs-higher-initiative-fraud-penalties</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;People who fraudulently sign petitions for ballot initiatives could  face stiffer penalties under legislation given initial approval by the  Missouri Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A bill endorsed Wednesday by senators would make  the crime of petition signature fraud a felony punishable by up to five  years in prison and a fine of between $1,000 and $25,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Violators currently can face a misdemeanor charge punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The  legislation also expands the crime to cover petition circulators who  use trickery to obtain signatures or who knowingly submit forms with  false signatures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more at BND.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bnd.com/2013/04/04/2562735/mo-senate-backs-higher-initiative.html&quot;&gt; Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/ap">AP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/bill">bill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/petition">petition</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:25:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4488 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: House approves initiative petition legislation</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-house-approves-initiative-petition-legislation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Missouri House has approved legislation aimed at increasing the  transparency of initiative petitions that bypass the Legislature to put  proposed laws or constitutional amendments on statewide ballots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sponsors of the petitions must gather signatures from registered voters for their proposal to qualify for the ballot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under  the House legislation, the secretary of state&amp;#8217;s office would offer a  public comment period after a proposal is submitted. For those proposals  that actually qualify for the ballot, the Joint Committee on  Legislative Research would hold a public hearing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-house-approves-initiative-petition-legislation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/intimidation">intimidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/petition">petition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/st-louis-today">St. Louis Today</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:15:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4438 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ag Interests, Legislators Lash Out at Initiatives</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/ag-interests-legislators-lash-out-at-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Those vexatious legislators in Missouri, irked by a recent ballot measure, are attempting to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot, which would limit the people’s power of petition.  The proposed amendment –HJR 11 – overwhelmingly passed the House of Representatives last week. It would allow only the legislature to create laws regarding farming and agriculture in the Show-Me State.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/ag-interests-legislators-lash-out-at-initiatives&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/ag-interests-legislators-lash-out-at-initiatives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/ballot-question">ballot question</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:27:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4422 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Initiative petitions shouldn&#039;t regulate agriculture</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-initiative-petitions-shouldnt-regulate-agriculture</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Still smarting over state voters’ approval of strict dog-breeding  rules in 2010, some Missouri legislators want to bar future initiative  petition drives from dealing with agricultural issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The House voted Thursday to place on the November 2014 ballot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.mo.gov/billsummary.aspx?bill=HJR11&amp;amp;year=2013&amp;amp;code=R&quot;&gt;a constitutional amendment&lt;/a&gt; that would guarantee “the right of farmers and ranchers to engage in  modern farming and ranching practices.” Under the proposal, only the  General Assembly could write laws regulating “livestock production and  ranching practices.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The House passed the amendment on a vote of 110-41. It now moves to the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-initiative-petitions-shouldnt-regulate-agriculture&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/st-louis-today">St. Louis Today</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:10:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4421 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two Views of Show-Me State’s Petition Process</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/two-views-of-show-me-state-s-petition-process-0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two statewide elected officials seem at odds over the petition process in Missouri. Jason Kander, the Show-Me State’s new Secretary of State, just implemented an online program that displays initiative proposals as soon as they are filed, allowing the public a five-day comment period &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the secretary of state and the state auditor must complete their ballot summary and fiscal statement, respectively.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;&quot;&gt;In the past, initiative proposals were not posted on the secretary of state’s website until after a ballot summary and fiscal note were written, so citizens had no comment period at this stage in the process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/two-views-of-show-me-state-s-petition-process-0&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/neal/two-views-of-show-me-state-s-petition-process-0#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/petition">petition</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:12:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4366 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mixed results on Springfield’s charter amendments targeting citizen initiatives</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt;Earlier this summer, the City Council in Springfield, Missouri, hurriedly placed two charter amendments on yesterday’s Aug. 7 primary election ballot hoping to make it far more difficult to petition a citizen initiative onto the local ballot. Voters defeated one of the measures, Charter Amendment 2, by a 51 to 49 percent vote, but passed the other, Charter Amendment 3, by 52 to 48 percent. &lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/local-ballot-measures">local ballot measures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/missouri">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:38:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4338 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mixed results on Springfield’s charter amendments targeting citizen initiatives</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt;Earlier this summer, the City Council in Springfield, Missouri, hurriedly placed two charter amendments on yesterday’s Aug. 7 primary election ballot hoping to make it far more difficult to petition a citizen initiative onto the local ballot. Voters defeated one of the measures, Charter Amendment 2, by a 51 to 49 percent vote, but passed the other, Charter Amendment 3, by 52 to 48 percent. &lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 100%;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensincharge.org/blog/paul/mixed-results-on-springfield-s-charter-amendments-targeting-citizen-initiatives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/local-ballot-measures">local ballot measures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/tags/missouri">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:38:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4338 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Fighting the Petition Effort</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-fighting-the-petition-effort</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When Safer Missouri Citizens Coalition called for a petition ceremony for its local control ballot initiative on Monday, they were met with citizens demanding real local control.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The group, sponsored by billionaire financier Rex Sinquefield, had promised the support of more civic leaders and elected officials than it was able to deliver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stlamerican.com/news/columnists/article_563d252e-4c62-11e1-9cf6-0019bb2963f4.html&quot;&gt;Read more at The St. Louis American.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/the-st-louis-american">The St. Louis American</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:05:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AmandaKathryn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4304 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Petition Efforts Focus on Payday Loans, Minimum Wage</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-petition-efforts-focus-on-payday-loans-minimum-wage</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two Missouri organizations are working together to push ballot measures seeking to cap payday loan interest rates and increase the state minimum wage.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Missourians for Responsible Lending and Give Missourians A Raise kicked off the two initiative petition campaigns at a joint event Saturday at the Boone County Commission Chambers. The group Grass Roots Organizing put on the event&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2012/01/29/petition-efforts-focus-on-payday-loans-minimum-wage/&quot;&gt;Read more at CBS News 10 St. Louis.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/cbs-news-st-louis">CBS News St. Louis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:29:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AmandaKathryn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4294 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: E-Verify Rivals Spend More in Springfield Ballot Measure</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-e-verify-rivals-spend-more-in-springfield-ballot-measure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Groups on either side of the proposed E-Verify ordinance have begun spending money to woo voters, with opponents so far outspending supporters more than 10-to-1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a Jan. 22 email sent to Springfield City Council and others, Grupo Latinoamericano President Yolanda Lorge said opponents of the ballot measure had spent about $20,000, mostly on printed material and a phone campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-leader.com/section/service&quot;&gt;Read more at News Leader.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/news-leader-0">News Leader</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:22:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AmandaKathryn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4290 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Coalition Aims to Put Minimum Wage Increase on Nov. Ballot</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-coalition-aims-to-put-minimum-wage-increase-on-nov-ballot</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Missouri&amp;#8217;s minimum wage workers could be getting a $1 an hour raise next year if a ballot initiative sponsored by the Give Missourians A Raise coalition makes it to the November ballot. The coalition needs to collect about 200,000 registered voters&amp;#8217; signatures between now and May for the initiative to qualify.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Currently, Missouri&amp;#8217;s minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8220;About 290,000 Missouri workers would see an immediate raise if the initiative passes in November,&amp;#8221; Montague Simmons told the People&amp;#8217;s World. Simmons is the St. Louis minimum wage initiative coordinator for Missouri Jobs with Justice, a key member of the coalition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-coalition-aims-to-put-minimum-wage-increase-on-nov-ballot&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/peoples-world">People&amp;#039;s World</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:31:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AmandaKathryn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4248 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Group to Push ‘Right to Work’ Ballot Initiative</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-group-to-push-right-to-work-ballot-initiative</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While many state legislators shy from the issue, an outside group plans to file an initiative petition this month to place a so-called “right to work” constitutional amendment on the 2012 ballot.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Greg Johns, vice president of Missourians for Right to Work,’ intends to file the petition with the secretary of state’s office some time this month, according to sources familiar with the process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://politicmo.com/2012/01/05/group-to-push-right-to-work-ballot-initiative/&quot;&gt;Read more at PoliticMo.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/politicmo">PoliticMO</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:17:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AmandaKathryn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4243 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Tax for police will be on Independence city ballot</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-tax-for-police-will-be-on-independence-city-ballot</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Time and time again, Independence City Council members say they’ve heard their constituents express concern for public safety and for an increased presence of police officers. Come April 3, voters will say whether they are willing to pay extra – as property owners – for that sense of security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.net/news/x278311147/Council-puts-police-tax-on-April-ballot&quot;&gt;Read the story from the &lt;em&gt;Blue Springs Examiner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/blue-springs-examiner">Blue Springs Examiner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:55:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4218 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Springfield voters weigh in on e-verify system</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-springfield-voters-weigh-in-on-e-verify-system</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In February, Springfield voters will decide if businesses must use the federal E-Verify database to check whether potential employees can work legally in the United States.  Now, we know what voters will read on the ballot for the controversial proposed ordinance. With a deadline of Tuesday to get it on the February ballot, council members voted and passed one version of the ballot language for the E-Verify issue.  They had three possible versions of ballot language to consider.  The council decided, at the advice of legal counsel, that the first version was not a good choice because of a legal issue with the language involving who would collect fines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.ky3.com/2011-11-28/e-verify-ordinance_30452767&quot;&gt;Read the story from KY 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/ky-3">KY 3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:33:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4200 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Marijuana petition being circulated</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-marijuana-petition-being-circulated</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A petition now circulating in Missouri would place a constitutional amendment on the November 2012 ballot to legalize marijuana for those 21 or older. The &amp;#8220;Show-Me Cannabis Initiative&amp;#8221; calls for a sweeping repeal of criminal prohibitions against marijuana in Missouri.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.westendword.com/hc.e.177981.lasso&quot;&gt;Read the story from &lt;em&gt;West End Word&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/west-end-word">West End Word</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:35:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4192 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Payday loan battle at the ballot box</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-payday-loan-battle-at-the-ballot-box</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A battle looms over how much lenders can charge for payday loans in Missouri — and it promises to be an expensive one. A coalition of religious groups and civic organizations have begun collecting signatures to get a measure on the state&amp;#8217;s 2012 ballot that would limit the cost of short-term loans. Voters would then have the option of capping annual interest rates on those loans — which would include payday and car title loans — at 36 percent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/battle-looming-over-missouri-payday-loan-restrictions/article_e4db6fa6-c220-5837-805f-609d92212cd5.html&quot;&gt;Read the story from the &lt;em&gt;St. Louis Post Dispatch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/st-louis-post-dispatch">St. Louis Post-Dispatch</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:47:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4188 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Local control measure will have backing of police</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-local-control-measure-will-have-backing-of-police</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The St. Louis Police Officers&amp;#8217; Association now is supporting a ballot initiative to return control of the police department to the city from the state. The group announced today that it reached a compromise with Mayor Francis Slay and representatives of A Safer Missouri, which is funded by retired investor Rex Sinquefield, to withdraw amendments filed in March that would have placed the question of local control of the St. Louis and Kansas City police departments before voters next year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/st-louis-police-to-support-local-control-ballot-initiative/article_a572b59a-0bef-11e1-b268-0019bb30f31a.html&quot;&gt;Read the story from the &lt;em&gt;St. Louis Post-Dispatch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/st-louis-post-dispatch">St. Louis Post-Dispatch</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:41:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4168 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Missouri: Minimum wage increase focus of ballot initiatives</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensincharge.org/news/missouri-minimum-wage-increase-focus-of-ballot-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Missouri voters could be asked next year to raise the state&amp;#8217;s minimum wage to $8.25. The secretary of state&amp;#8217;s office on Tuesday approved the summaries on two initiative petitions, meaning proponents can begin collecting signatures to get the measures on the 2012 ballot. Missouri&amp;#8217;s minimum wage currently matches the federal requirement of $7.25 an hour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9QSPU8O1.htm&quot;&gt;Read the story from Bloomberg Businessweek&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/source/bloomberg-businessweek">Bloomberg Businessweek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensincharge.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:50:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trevor Ford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4160 at http://www.citizensincharge.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
